"At least we can prove four little boys didn't just vanish into thin air."Īrmed with the new evidence, Stabler goes back to Carlos. Since the only reason the 1978 case would make Anna think of the Boy in the Box case is if she already knew they were connected, which the police are just beginning to piece together, Stabler realizes Anna may know something the police don't after all. Millie, however, is more interested in the timing why, she asks, would Anna just happen to come forward at the exact same time as they're reopening the case? The answer comes when they learn that a local paper had printed an obituary for the boy from the 1978 case whose body was found. Anna claims that her father murdered her brother and dumped his body in a box, but Stabler is skeptical, not least because Anna's father died a good decade before the Boy in the Box case. They find the woman, Anna Gable, in a park and bring her in, but it's an uphill battle, as she is a long-time drug user who has suffered severe brain damage as a result.
Just then, they get a new lead: a woman has come forward claiming to be a witness to a murder that matches the Boy in the Box case. Millie confirms that she's found more evidence to suggest a link, but very little to help them towards a solution.
Their livelihood depends on their boss not going to jail." -Munch "Employees aren't exactly unimpeachable alibis.
0 kommentar(er)
